or companies that are focused mainly on sustainable activities, the ESG score is an element that guides boards and shareholders to better environmental,
social, and governance (ESG) practices.
These scores are a key way for a third-party rating and ESG reporting that organizations can measure their efforts, and also a useful tool to compare the ESG performance of all the companies.
If a company fails to meet compliance obligations for environmental impact, or the diversity and equity issues are putting the company at risk, the ESG scores and ratings are the best way to find out this information about companies, making the process simpler and easier.
What is an ESG score?
ESG definition is all about investors and their way of evaluating a company’s performance in terms of ESG issues or its exposure to some related issues. Similar to how a credit score can communicate a customer’s ability to pay back a debt, just like an ESG score can communicate how efficient an organization’s strategy is.
These scores are calculated according to a set of ESG metrics and can be expressed on a number scale or with a letter ranking system. They are calculated by analyzing some data points that are related to the ESG impact of a company and also with their practices. The data is collected from many different sources, such as regulatory filings, company reports, and also third-party databases.
ESG score itself along with the surrounding context fills the image of the company’s performance regarding the environmental, social, and governance issues.
Subscribe to our newsletter
How is the ESG score calculated?
There is not a specific methodology that can be used to calculate the score and can vary depending on the rating agency or the research firm. But, here are some factors that are considered when calculating a company’s ESG score:
The issues about environment and sustainability ESG not only include how the companies have an impact on the natural world but also their plans for a continuous improvement. Criteria for a company's environmental impact include metrics like greenhouse gas emissions, waste management, the efficiency of energy, water usage, pollution, and biodiversity.
These social ESG responsibility practices in the ESG score are calculated by the company’s impact on its surrounding world both outside and inside of the office. The social measurement includes product safety, human rights, community relations, health and safety, diversity and inclusion, and labor practices.
This score focuses on the business ethics inside the corporation and also on its individual ESG responsibility. The governance criteria include transparency, executive pay, shareholder rights, board composition, and business ethics.
After these data and information have been collected and evaluated, each company and organization will be assigned an ESG score. These scores will range from 0 to 100 and a higher score will indicate their commitment to environmental, social, and governance practices and issues.
Several organizations and rating agencies are calculating the score differently, each one with their methodology and sources from where they are collecting the data. Here are some commonly used sources for ESG score calculation:
- MSCI ESG Fundamentals: is the leading provider of ESG scores and ratings, and their methodology is generally used by investors and asset managers. The methodology is based on the company’s exposure to some industry-specific ESG risks and on how that company will manage those risks.
- Sustainalytics: represents another big rating agency and their calculating methodology is focused on a company’s exposure to ESG risks and their ability to manage those. Sustainalytics also evaluates the ESG performance of a company over various issues such as climate change, labor practices, or corporate governance.
- Corporate Knights: they are a media and research company that is focused on publishing an annual ranking of the most sustainable corporations around the world. Their methodology is all about the evaluation and calculation process based on various ESG factors such as carbon productivity, diversity, and inclusion along with clean revenue.
- Bloomberg ESG Data Service: it provides investors and financial professionals with ESG data and analytics. The Bloomberg methodology is based on the company’s exposure to ESG risks and also on its ability to face those risks successfully. They offer ESG scores for over 11,000 around the world.
- Dow Jones Sustainability Indices: a series of stock market indices that track the performance of companies and organizations with powerful ESG practices. Their methodology focuses on evaluating these companies according to a range of ESG factors such as climate strategy, human rights and also corporate governance.
Because there are so many rating agencies and also a lot of scoring system frameworks to use, the process of finding the best scoring provider can be a difficult one.
In the decision process is important to also consider the questions that might help you:
- Has your company enough self-reported data?
- How much of the publicly reported data is available for your company?
- What rating agency is fitting best for your company and activities?
- If you want to compare your score performance with other companies and competitors, which score provider will you use?
- What metrics, information, or other ESG factors do you think are the most useful for your stakeholders?
- There are regulations or corporate governance that are influencing the type of rating needed for your organization?
Types of ESG score
Indeed, there is not a general ESG rating system for all companies and there is not an ESG score that can compare them and their activities. So, because of that, the score falls into three broad families:
- Issue-specific ESG score - this type of score can define a company’s performance according to a single issue such as a financial aspect.
- ESG scores that are category-specific - this type can weigh various ESG factors regarding a single aspect such as environmental, social, or governance. The scoring system will choose one of the three areas to concentrate on and will gather plenty of information to be able to have a sense of the company’s impact in that specific category.
- General ESG score - this type manages to pull various information and data regarding all of the three factors to provide a general ranking. A good example of the general ESG score is the Bloomberg score.
In general, an ESG score can be evaluated on a scale from 0 to 100, which means that 100 is the highest score possible for a company. However, some rating agencies such as MSCI manage to stand out from the others, because it uses a seven-point scale starting from 0.000 to 10.000 in correlation with a letter rating.
For the MSCI scale, CC is the worst score possible and includes a score from 0.000 to 2.856, BB is the middle score starting from 2.857 to 5.713 and the best score is AA starting from 5.714 to 10.000.
Why do ESG scores matter?
The company's performance regarding ESG issues is becoming an important factor for stakeholders and the overall ESG investing decisions. From cybersecurity, and climate change to diversity, a good score represents a priceless element that is always helping organizations and companies to:
- Anticipate the future risks and opportunities
- Adopt a longer-term thinking with the focus on strategy
- Prioritize the value creation on a long-term basis above some short-term gains
The ESG score of a company and organization represents more than a method of measuring their ecological footprint. It includes human resource procedures and employee satisfaction. Simply, the ESG score is important because it represents an evaluation of the way a company is performing besides its mission, marketing language, or profit reporting. It’s important when it comes to risk management of economic and social factors, to raise awareness toward these issues.
Eventually, investors will recognize how much money is invested in ESG initiatives, and they can predict the long-term result by just looking at each score. But the ESG plays an important part in the evaluation process, especially in very competitive markets. If your company has an inferior ESG score or never had one, investors are likely to search for a rival business.
A lower score can have significant consequences and researchers show that companies that include ESG principles have a lower risk of ESG investing and are stronger over time.
How are ESG scores used in the market?
The scoring systems are created for various cases and stakeholders and are based on their associated needs. Some of these are specially designed to sustain some capital allocation decisions, while others can support human capital management and decisions from the staff.
For instance, the Carbon Disclosure Project represents an NGO scoring system designed for corporate performance about some environmental issues such as carbon emissions, climate change, or forestry. Known as, CDP, is popular across the ESG investing community, and asset managers can use it to find out the top performers that are taking care of environmental issues.
Also, Just Capital represents an NGO scoring system that is focused mainly on its consumers and evaluates the corporate performance and stakeholder issues, like the way a company can create value for its employees, suppliers, and also for local communities. Just capital is available to use by consumers and prospective employees to search easier a company to buy from or to work for.
What are the potential limitations or issues that an ESG score might have?
Organizations and companies should be very aware of these potential issues and limitations that might occur:
- The absence of standardization
A big issue is that there is no industry standard for the scoring. While various industry frameworks are made for ESG reporting, they usually represent the base for the score calculation. The lack of standardization here is making every comparison between different scoring methodologies difficult. Due to this difference, some companies can have a higher ESG score on one scoring mechanism and a lower one on the other mechanism.
- An issue about the self-reported data
Companies and organizations can choose a traditional ESG reporting framework, but usually, they prefer to report the data themselves. In this case, without a third party that can validate their information, it is more likely that the data will be subjective, biased in some way, or potentially incorrect.
Regarding the environmental part from an ESG score, greenwashing can be a risk because some organizations may take advantage of it and make some claims. These claims can influence the final ESG score without having a material impact.
From companies, there is a lack of transparency regarding the weighting and calculation of the score. It’s true that there already exists a common knowledge about how these ESG scores are calculated but only some companies manage to provide full transparency about these calculations.
- An extended range of data
ESG score covers a lot of data regarding the environment, sustainability, and corporate governance topics. But, with this score, it is possible to not have the full extended range that is necessary to include everything applicable for a complete ESG picture.
How can companies keep up with the changes in the landscape of ESG?
There are so many ESG factors that are contributing to the success of a company or organization and it should be no wonder that there are not some general agreements about the calculation of ESG score. Besides its complexity, a score represents a precious tool that businesses can use to evaluate their performance, manage risks, attract investors or consumers, and choose future initiatives.
ESG score can provide not only an awareness of the current position of the company but also can offer the answer to how every organization can secure its position in the scoring system.
By
Eva Robinson
•
September 19, 2024 1:06 PM
.webp)
.webp)
